🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to find the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.